Quick summary: The International Criminal Court has cleared a major legal hurdle by rejecting Rodrigo Duterte’s jurisdictional challenge, ensuring that the former president remains in detention as judges decide whether to proceed to a full trial. This landmark ruling reinforces the principle that national withdrawal from international treaties does not grant immunity for crimes committed during membership, potentially reshaping how global human rights law holds former heads of state accountable. For the victims of the Philippine war on drugs and the broader international community, the decision validates the pursuit of justice through multilateral institutions while highlighting the profound implications for judicial practice and the mental well being of those seeking closure.
Judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Wednesday, 22nd April, 2026, threw out a jurisdictional challenge by former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte, keeping alive the prospect of a trial over his war on drugs.
The 81-year-old faces three counts of crimes against humanity over murders allegedly committed during his crackdown on drug users and pushers — first as mayor of Davao City between 2013 and 2016, then as president until March 2019, when the Philippines withdrew from the ICC.
Duterte’s defence had argued the court had no authority over alleged crimes in the Philippines because the country is no longer a party to the Rome Statute, the ICC’s founding text. The prosecution countered that the alleged crimes occurred while the Philippines was still a member, and an October 2025 pre-trial chamber ruling sided with prosecutors, finding the investigation had begun before Manila’s withdrawal. The appeals court upheld that ruling Wednesday, dismissing all four grounds of the defence’s challenge.
“Having rejected the entire appeal, the appeal chamber considers that the defence request for the immediate and unconditional release of Mr Duterte is moot,” said presiding judge Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza.
Duterte’s defence lawyer Nicholas Kaufman said he was unsurprised by the outcome. “Allowing the appeal would have practically emptied the Court’s docket,” he said in a statement to AFP.
In a separate procedure, judges are weighing whether to confirm charges against Duterte — the final step before a trial that would be the first against a former Asian head of state. At February hearings, prosecutors alleged Duterte was responsible for thousands of deaths, while his defence argued there was no “smoking gun” directly linking his rhetoric and threats against drug users to actual murders.
A decision on whether evidence is sufficient to proceed to full trial is expected from the Pre-Trial Chamber on or before 28th April.
Duterte has been in detention at The Hague since 12th March, 2025. He is unlikely to appear in court in person — judges granted his request to skip the February hearings after his defence said he was not mentally fit. A January 2026 ruling, however, found that he retained the functional mental capacity to understand the proceedings.
The only public glimpse of Duterte since his arrest came at an initial appearance via videolink, at which he came across as confused and exhausted. He did not appear at Wednesday’s reading of the decision either.
About the Author
