A 56-year-old Singaporean security guard has been sentenced to 14 days in jail and fined RM7,000 (approximately US$1,733 or S$2,200, depending on exchange rates at the time of reporting) after pleading guilty to insulting Islam during a visit to Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Mohamed Anim Atam appeared unrepresented before Magistrate A Shaarmini at the Johor Bahru Magistrates’ Court on Friday, 21st August, where he admitted to deliberately uttering words insulting Islam with the intention of wounding the religious feelings of another person under Section 298 of the Penal Code. The offence carries a maximum jail term of one year, a fine, or both.
The incident took place at about 5pm on 30th July while Atam was travelling in an e-hailing car from Jalan Tun Razak to Jalan Meldrum near the city centre. According to the facts of the case presented in court, he described the Quran as lacking in compassion and focused only on killing. His remarks were overheard by the driver, Muhamad Danial Haikal Nadzahakim, 29, who recorded a two-minute video of the conversation in which Atam can be heard uttering the offending words in Malay. After being chided by the driver, Atam apologised several times before the vehicle stopped and he alighted. The driver uploaded the footage to social media, where it quickly went viral, prompting a police report on 31st July.
The Singapore Police Force confirmed that the man was arrested in Singapore and handed over to the Royal Malaysia Police on 18th August pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the Malaysian court. The swift cooperation between the two countries’ police forces enabled his transfer across the border once the warrant was issued.
Court records show Atam entered a guilty plea without legal representation, allowing the matter to be concluded on the same day as the hearing. During the proceedings, he appealed for a fine only, citing high blood pressure and ongoing divorce proceedings that required him to appear before the Syariah Court in Singapore.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Eizlan Azhar sought a proportionate sentence, telling the court that the offence had touched upon highly sensitive issues in Malaysia involving race, religion, and royalty, and had caused a significant public outcry on social media.
Magistrate A Shaarmini took into account the plea of guilt but determined that a custodial element was necessary given the sensitivity of the subject matter. The magistrate ordered the 14-day jail term to run from the date of Atam’s arrest on Tuesday, 18th August. Failure to pay the RM7,000 fine would result in an additional three months in prison.
The case highlights the strict enforcement of laws protecting religious feelings in Malaysia, particularly where content spreads rapidly online and engages what authorities term 3R issues of race, religion, and royalty. Section 298 of the Penal Code is frequently applied in cases involving statements or gestures that deliberately wound religious sentiments, and prosecutors emphasised that the online dissemination of the recording amplified the impact of the remarks.
Local media reported widespread attention to the video in the days after it appeared, prompting the formal investigation and subsequent arrest. Authorities in both countries have not issued further comment beyond the Singapore Police Force’s confirmation of the handover. The case serves as a reminder of the legal boundaries surrounding religious commentary in Malaysia, especially when recorded and shared publicly.
About the Author
